JobFish: Commentary

Many people are facing dire times during a prolonged economic downturn, which started by and large in late 2007, although depending upon your specialty, the beginnings of the recession started in the ‘80s with the outsourcing of American manufacturing jobs to other countries.  It was just a matter of time before white collar work got outsourced too.  The politics of the situation, though, do not change the reality for many people.  With bills to pay and many people out of work for two years or more with no unemployment benefits, philosophical discussions are a moot issue.  Solving the problem is tantamount.  For some, joining the military is an option, especially if you are younger, but for others that is not an option.

Although I cannot promise anyone a sure fire way that guarantees a job, I can tell you how to what the best strategies are, which will place you in the best possible position, so that you can get one of the few jobs, which are available.  You do not have to work hard, but you do have to put in time and be smart.  Okay, so let us begin.

The first thing that you should do is to discard old beliefs.  Sending out five or so targeted resumes that you research and know that you are qualified for every couple of weeks does not cut the mustard anymore, so to speak.  What you think of your qualifications is not as important as what the employer and recruiter thinks of your qualifications.  Apply to anything and everything within plausibility of your field.  You do not need to read the job descriptions.  You only need to glance at it quickly.  Your motto should be to throw enough things against the wall, so that not only will something stick, namely that you get an interview, but that you get hired too.  You need to make a nuisance of yourself.  Be heard.  You should send out several hundred resumes every other day.  In a month time period, you should have sent out several thousand.  Yes, you can do that and not spend more than a couple hours a day on the activity.  I will tell you how later in this article.

In most jobs, one does a varied number of things.  For instance, many people in white collar jobs have to do a bit of project management, even if you are not the project manager (PM).  Maybe you had to train people.  Did you ever have to write something?  What I am driving after is that you should explore working in a related field.  It does not matter what you think of your skills, but what the hiring manager thinks.  I say hiring manager, because you can work around recruiters.  They are two dimensional in nature, as are human resource managers.  By the way, being a human resource manager is another possibility.

Create one resume for each type of work.  Mention every job that you had, but emphasize skills in the area that you want to push.  Try to recollect back to your time and think if you did anything in that field, if even scarcely.  If you did, play that up.  Do a search on job boards and find industry buzzwords in the field.  Research what they mean.  You can do that by doing a Google search.  Add those buzzwords, which you feel comfortable.  Maybe you can study a bit those buzzwords and do some practice exercises with them, so that you know the lingo.

When the going gets tough, the tough should start working smartly and aggressively.  Craft one cover letter for each job type. Be willing to accept a small decrease in pay, if you get into high-paying field for which you really do not have that many skills.  You will be receiving remuneration for advancing your skillset and getting into a new line of work.  Be happy.  I did not say to sell yourself short.  You should never do that.

When the topic of distance comes up, act like you have been to that location a zillion times.  The answer should always be that the distance is not bad and that you can do that easily.  What difference is it to anyone what the actual time is?  You are not being paid for it, so why discuss that you will be on the road for an hour.   Be firm and reassuring that the distance is not bad and that you are experienced.

Work every job board and be prepared to talk with recruiters and human resource personnel when they call.  Never, and I do mean NEVER, discuss your job search and how it is going with anyone.  It is not their business.  When a recruiter asks if you have any pending interviews, be firm that you do not discuss your job search.  Act like a manager and the one that is in charge.  Take control of the conversation.  That includes finding out what the job position is.  Most recruiter will not initially give out this information, as they want to screen you to see if you have the skillset.  They may ask you to describe your ideal job.  Try to avoid getting angry or agitated. That only hurts you. Obviously, the answer is any job that pays and is close to home, but you cannot say that, sadly. Tell them what they want to hear. You must tell them that you want to work in that field for which they are calling.  How can you do that?   You do that by keeping track of which jobs you applied to and having the information at your fingertips indexed by company name and contact person.  If someone is calling you, more than likely it is because you applied for the job.

I will give you a word of advice.  Be very cautious about giving out your social security number and other key pieces of information.  You do not need to fill that out on an initial interview.  If it becomes serious, then provide it.  If a company requests it for tracking purposes, such as with Bank of America, I would think twice.  Companies like Bank of America do not care about you.  They could care less.  It is up to you to protect your own interests, just as they do their own.  I would think twice about applying for those types of jobs.  Maybe you want to if the situation is desperate enough, but I would still error on the side of caution.

Searching for a job effectively today cannot be done the old fashioned way.  Employers and recruiters have tools to help them, you should as well.  More than likely you have either a computer or a laptop. It is time that you get a software program which will help you do the chores related to finding a job. When checking into a software tool, your software tool should allow you to apply for jobs without opening a million tabs. It should assist you with your with resumes and a host of other things.

Be careful to not get flustered and throw up your hands doing a job search. Let us look at a common situation, where this happens. Remember, people will only see the end result, the final email, not all the hard work that went into applying for a job. Job boards are the most notorious, as far as being a pain in the rear.  Even so called simple boards, like Craig’s List, are a pain to use.  Take Craig’s List, in order to apply for a job, you must navigate to a job category and then open up jobs of interest on a separate tab.  You then have to open up a new blank email form, one for each job, and then fill out each piece of information that goes into an email, one by one. You can easily spend ten minutes to send out one resume.  The work does not end there, as you should keep track of this application, so that you can add information later on and retrieve information later on too. Yes, this part of the job search process is the most tedious and the most dreadful.

Be careful to not feel humiliated dealing with job boards, endlessly rewriting resumes, and especially talking with recruitment and employment contacts endlessly.  There is also the matter of a long period of your life, not knowing when money will flow again, without money, seeing your life put on hold.  That has an enormously damaging feeling to one’s psyche. To avoid these issues, even with help, you should do things that reinforce your sense of self-worth. For different people that can mean different things. Spend a portion of each week reinforcing your self-esteem. That will help you in your job search, as nobody wants to hire a loser.

You should also note that the best time to apply for jobs is the first thing in the morning, so that people see your email when they first get in.  If you send out emails on a Sunday or in the afternoon, it will get buried along with other people’s email.  Did you know that applying for a job on a job board merely sends an email to the person that took out the ad?  This restriction puts more pressure on you.

Okay, I suppose that I do not have to tell you, but dress well and dress to impress, even if you are a college graduate.  I do not say that lightly.  I talk from experience.   I was still at college, when I went for my first job interview.  I asked my father how I should dress.  He told me that I am a student and then will see me as such, so I should dress that way.  Not having anyone tell me different, I listened to him.  I was taken aside after the interview and given a talk to by the hiring manager about how to dress.  Needless to say, I did not get that job.  Speaking of learning things through the School of Hard Knocks, and I hold a PhD from that university graduated with high marks, you should listen to criticism and accept it if it is valid, but reject it if you do not feel that it suits you.  People say things to help you, but that does not mean that everything that someone says will help you.  You know yourself best, but do not be prideful and reject good advice.

If you want to dress well and on a budget, I would recommend JC Penney, if you happen to have one in your area.  They have great men’s and women’s professional outfits at great prices that anyone can afford.  I would also check out Nordstrom and Nordstrom Rack.  Sometimes they have last year’s outfits at reduced prices.

When the phone rings and you start talking to someone, if you do not know an answer, do not try to bluff anyone.  That looks bad.  Jot down the question for latter research, but for the moment just say that you do not know.   The worst that can happen is that you blow the conversation, but will learn the question for the next person that calls.  Many company’s do a phone screen at first, so expect that.

More than likely, if you get the job, then you will get the offer within a day, most likely within a short time of the interview.  When interviewers keep interviewing, then they did not like you.  It is as simple as that, although they may interview other people and then get back to you, so you never know.

There is a job for everyone, just as there is that certain someone for everyone.  You have to be persistent and stay in there.  Keep up the education.  If there is a long period of unaccounted for time in your resume, add in short block to account for the period. I would recommend adding in some sort of education.  That can show people that your skills are still relevant.

The first step to finding a job is to stay focused and come up with a plan.  Decide that you will apply to jobs.  Do that like you would any other chore that you do every day.  The most important thing is to not get discouraged and remember that you are a valuable person.  Be creative.

By following these steps, you will see that the phone will start to ring and you will get interviews, both phone and onsite.  From there, it is up to you.  Be positive and smile at the interview.  Do not forget to shake the person’s hand.

Let me know your thoughts.  I would like to hear from you.  You can leave a comment on the blog or by sending an email via the site.

Sarah M. Weinberger
ButterflyVista Corporation

http://www.jobfish.com
http://blog.jobfish.com

ButterflyVista is the maker of JobFish 2010, a job search program to help the job seeker find a job. Just as the iPhone revolutionized the smartphone market, JobFish 2010 is revolutionizing the job search market. From help with your resumes, to working with the job boards, such as Craig’s List, applying for jobs, and so much more, JobFish 2010 relieves the burdens of the mundane stuff, which usually frustrates job seekers beyond belief. Knowledge and organization is power, and JobFish gives you both.

Today’s Los Angeles Times begs for a commentary, sadly not in a positive way.  The problem with a lot of people in the media and in government is that they live in a bubble, separate from other people in the world and the problems they face.    You hear citations of talking with “experts”, economists and government officials of various kinds.  Reading the paper is definitely an exercise in patience.  Who needs yoga, when the media exists.  By the way, with the possible exception of Keith Olbermann on MSNBC.

Have you heard?  The recession ended in June 2009.  You should get at least one interview for every ten resumes that you send out (source today’s Los Angeles Times), and the people that are suffering are those in finance and manufacturing.  There was a third category, but I forget offhand what that was.  Jobs are plentiful, if you live in places like Washington D.C.  The Los Angeles Times blamed the high unemployment on a mismatch of where the jobs are to where people live.  People in California suffer because jobs are plentiful outside of California.

I live in California and am quite familiar with the job situation and the causes here in California, most specifically with the greater Los Angeles.

I was telling a friend of mine today about what the L.A. Times said and my friend’s comment was two things.  One, and he is closer to being right on the first point, is that it takes more like submitting one thousand resumes for every interview unless you are absolutely 100% qualified and your resume gets to the right person and you are the right age and this and that and this and that.  I could hear my mother saying, “and if my grandmother would have a penis, he would be my grandfather.”  Exactly!  I added that one has to be around 28 years old too.  They are the easiest to train, look up to companies as something special, dirt cheap, and will work hard and long hours.  He also likes to talk about the liberal media.  He is a Rush Limbaugh ditto head, Glen Beck too.   He is wrong, obviously, on the second point.

I keep carping on the same points, but they are valid.  First off, engineers and other white collar workers seem be be forgotten.  Secondly, I am familiar with the profession, but before talking about engineering further, I want to digress to tell a story that I heard.

I talked with my sister recently.  She is a medical doctor and her husband works in a hospital.  I was told that up until recently there was a woman, who came by every afternoon, picked up the Dictaphone, and brought back a written transcription the following day.  After years of service,  how do you think that she was rewarded?  Did she get a raise?  Yes, just not the kind that you are thinking about.  She got a quick life from having a foot hand on her butt and tossing her out the door.  She was laid off.  Why?  The hospital could hire a company, in India in this case, at half the cost.

I used to work at Verizon.  Before going on, I will say that I loved that job, the people, and learned a lot.  What is also true is that Verizon was guilty of not outsourcing one job, but virtually the entire engineering effort.  Not only did quite a bit of interaction involve interfacing with the Indian team (numbering in the hundreds from what I could tell), but I would say that over 70% of the people in my building were Indian too working on an H1-B visa.  I was one of only a few non-Indians.  That mix was not good enough.  Verizon decided to close that building and handle the remaining work in Texas, at least until 500 unlucky souls there got the ax.  Verizon was laying people off left and right during my term there.

You may say that Verizon was a special case.  Nope.  My next job was even worse.   Let me just say that the next time you fly on a 787 Dreamliner, you can think of the plane as an outsourced plane.  The trend is getting worse, not better.

Of the companies that I have associated with in one form or another, most believe in outsourcing like many believe in spending $5 (per day) on a cup of coffee at Starbucks.  Some people waste more than $5 per day.  I know of at least two people that fit that bill.

I am not trying to be racist, far from it.  Yes, companies have the right to go where labor is cheap.  I agree with that statement.  They do whatever the law permits.

Before continuing, I talked with a recruiter recently and was told the outsourcing figure.   There are currently about 6 million people working currently in the United States on an H1-B visa.  The government created the H1-B visa program, so that companies could hire talent that was not here in the United States.    The H1-B visa program morphed into a program that does everything but what it was meant to do.

The trouble with engineering and many other industries is not the recession.  The recession is responsible for some job loss, as was the housing bubble burst, but not all jobs.  Manufacturing jobs got outsourced.  “American” car manufacturers build most of their cars outside the United States.  NAFTA is a fancy way of saying take jobs out of the United States.  That was when the problem started.   The problem started with manufacturing and spread to many other industries.

What is my comment about the article that I read that a person should get a minimum of one (1) interview for every ten resumes submitted?   If I were to say horseshit, which was my first thought, I would be saying something bad about horses, and horses are nice creatures, so I will reframe from that thought.  Is there a word to take its place?

As long as I am venting, illegal immigration plays a toll.  I know the Republicans want to score brownie points with their base on this issue, but there are jobs lost in this way.  I was at a well known restaurant chain recently.   They definitely hire knowingly illegal immigrants.  One bragged to me that he came here illegally from El Salvador and makes $10 per hour.  He holds two jobs.  No, I am not making that up, and God alone only knows why he told me or was bragging to me on the topic.  Common sense would say that he would be quite as a church mouse on this topic.  Is he the only one, nope.  I feel for his story, but the truth is that he is taking away a job from an American.  Okay, illegal immigrants is a small percentage of the problem and outsourcing the white elephant, but even so.

Our former president said that migrant workers (that seems to whitewash the real phrase, no?) take on the jobs that no one else wants to.  Okay, I still do not know of a word to replace horseshit, because that comes to mind.  The truth is that there is no one that wants to work like a slave for $2 per hour in the fields or $10 per hour serving soup or warming potatoes for guests on Sundays.  I agree with that.  What would happen if we increased the wage to $25 in the field and in the restaurants?

What would happen if Congress got some Cojones and imposed a tax on H1-B visa and outsourcing, ff a company wants to outsource work, it would have to pay a tax of 20% plus 1.5 times the amount of money lost than if the jobs were done here?  What would happen if a company had to pay $2 million tax per year for every H1-B applicant .

The cost of goods would go up (guess what folks, they do anyways), but at least everyone that wanted a job would have a job.  They would be able to pay for goods.

Just to address one other point that I keep reading about in the papers and is so total whatever the word I should use (thoughts?).  “We are in a deflationary time, blah blah blah.”

Supercuts charges $2 more now than a few months ago, which is $2 more now than last year.  Restaurants charge significantly more now than in the past.  I am thinking of a certain national American Italian chain that doubled their prices in about a two to three year span.  Rents have gone up.  Groceries have absolutely gone up and not by a little bit.  Gasoline has skyrocketed.  Airline ticket prices have gone up.  We live in a radically inflationary time, just people do not complain and the media and government ignores the facts.

Another sticking point, as long as I am bitching, is a certain bank agreeing to stop foreclosures.  How about landlords agreeing not to collect rent and the courts agreeing not to hear any cases of tenants not paying rent, hence no evictions.  Did I make my point?  I am not being heartless either, far from it.  Housing costs had exponential inflation, not because people wanted a home, but because people wanted to become rich off of it, flip properties so to speak.  Yes, there are those that really did get hurt, but a lot more that played the game and should pay the price like the rest of us.

I totally get ticked off hearing that unemployment is bad and that people who receive it have a disinterest in finding real work.  That is the Republican mantra.   I am not even being biased.  They really say that and a lot.  I hear this view much more so than how most people in the GOP are against abortions and “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell.”  Every other speech this year seems to evoke how benefits should be cut and how employees are lazy.  Are you?

Finding work is a tough lonely job under  any circumstances and especially if you are out of work for long periods of time.  They are not lazy and really do work.  I cannot give work to people and nor can I pass legislation, but maybe in my own small way, I can help by creating a program that really does help job seekers get a job.  I wrote JobFish, because there was no tool that truly helped job seekers.  There was no company that listened to their needs.  ButterflyVista has tried to live up to the ideal to help people.  It was written by a job seeker, who knows from experience what is required.  JobFish has grown a lot this year by listening to all of you and incorporating many of the comments.  ButterflyVista in the future will continue to do the same.

I hope that with these blogs that there will be a discussion started and a groundswell building so that jobs really do come back and not just temporarily and at the expense of someone else.  Politics and jobs are interconnected; they always have been.  Fixing the economy takes time.  Fixing anything takes time, but breaking it is quick.

Do let us know your comments on JobFish.   We uploaded training videos to YouTube recently for anyone that feels a bit lost.

Sarah M. Weinberger
ButterflyVista Corporation

Unless I am mistaken, I think that I am the first to anoint the omnipotent Michael Landon as Saint.  After watching an episode last night of Little House, originally written for Bonanza, I thought of two things.  One, Michael Landon solves every problem large and small.  He can raise people from the almost / virtually dead (He Was Only Twelve with James), make drunks sober (Someone Please Love Me), and make the blind to see (not Mary, but someone else).  My thought was how many of us now with papers writing of a new and larger destitute class living at or below the poverty line would like a Michael Landon (aka Jonathan or Charles) riding up obviously not in a horse to solve our problems.  After all, if he can do all that, then why can he not help the vast amount of people who are unemployed?

The other thought that I had, and the reason why I am writing this blog entry, is that how little (and much) things have changed and how people do not like change.  It takes an act of God, or at least Landon , to get people to move.   I was in college and taking a history class.  On the final exam was one question that stood out.  I  do not recall if that was the only question on the final exam, but it was definitely the most memorable one.  “Do people like change, why or why not?”   We had to use historical context to back up our answer.  I naturally said that people absolutely like change, especially if it is for the good.  Ah, the arrogance of youth.  I am not saying that I am old now, but I was younger than.   People do not like change, even when they want it.

The world is full of examples.  People tine and time again like the status quo.  I can think of women that get beaten and stay, because that is what they know, to Congress perpetually moving at a snails pace with Global Warming and other issues.  Even people who want a job, clutch on to what they know, hence the tie-in to JobFish.  There is one exception, Steven Jobs of Apple.

Okay, he lost his magic with Apple TV, but judgment is still out on that one.  Okay, he gets a pass, because the studios will not allow him to sell shows for 99 cents.  I do not want to get off topic, but seriously have you ever seen anyone else talk virtually an entire planet to change their ways and pay a nice chunk of money for it?  The MP3 and cell phone markets were saturated.   A trip to Fry’s before the iPod offered dozens of nearly free to free MP3 players.  That was before Jobs came along and decided that people should pay multiple hundreds of dollars every other year for it.

My father was the last person on the planet that I thought would ever get an iPhone, but he did.  He proudly showed it off to me.  I do not even have one.   Yes, Steve Jobs is the exception to the rule that people do not like change.

With respect to the job market, people clutch to what they know.  They ask their friends, write notes, open up multiple tabs in a browser, or just use Microsoft Excel, maybe even just Notepad.  Post-It Notes work great too.

Just as the iPhone showed that there is a better way, the same holds true for finding a job.  Face it, with the possible exception of Craig’s List, but even there, the interest of job boards and staffing firms (recruiters) are with employers, not the employee.

Did you watch the episode of Medium last year, when Joe lost his job and contacted a recruiter, who worked tirelessly on his behalf, for free, to get him a new, and then ideal, job as an engineer?   If Michael Landon and Gene Roddenberry (society without money, etc. and definitely etc.) stretched reality, then Medium definitely did.  Staffing firms are simply not like that.  They just are not.  The same holds true for job boards.  Yes, there are a few people, who can always get a job by calling a couple of old colleagues or asking their friends.  I talked with someone the other day for which that was true.   I think that I can say for the most of us that that sentiment is not true.

Can there be such a thing as a savior for the average job seeker?  Okay, I am thinking of a Little Joe Cartwright or Bobby Ewing (think Dallas)?  From what I see, the answer is no.  The Los Angeles Times and other periodicals keep writing horror stories.  I read of one family that had to separate with the father living somewhere else and the mother and children living with her parents, because neither of them could find jobs.

There is one thing that I have noticed that always is in common.  The one out of work woman in Philadelphia sent out 200 resumes in the past twelve months and was not able to find a job.  Virtually every article, if not every article, which talks of people’s hardships, mentions that they sent out somewhere around 200 resumes in a year and could not find a job.

How about sending out 200 resumes in about three hours, give or take an hour?  How about doing that each and every single day?  What do you think the odds would be if the number increased radically?  What would happen if records were suddenly kept.  Information when someone calls would be available at an instant?  What if working with job boards did not require David Carradine’s Kung Fu character, Kwai Chang Caine, but rather maybe not became fun, but at least not bad.  What about if tweaking resumes, getting tips on interviews, looking at job metrics, and even having a better way to use Craig’s List were available?  It is with JobFish.

What do you think of a major newspaper comparison with the subject line “Which is more stylish and has better lines, Apple’s iPhone 4 or JobFish!”  Okay, there is something to be said for the styling of the Blackberry Torch, but if you ask me, the lines of JobFish are a bit better.

I wanted to give a bit more detail on Craig’s List.  The way that Craig’s List works is that you click on the email link, respond to the person who placed the ad, and wait for an email back.  How many times have you received an email back and not known which advertisement that the article pertained to?  Yeah, there might be a link, but usually not.  JobFish not only makes responding to Craig’s List job postings a snap, by automating the entire process, but JobFish also places a copy of the posting at the bottom of the email.  In that way, when you get a response back, you have the entire job posting at the bottom of the email for easy viewing.  That puts you one step up, as you can talk intelligently.  Information is power, and so to is JobFish.

My last comment for this entry is sadly religious institutions and the people inside them for the most part, or at least from my own experience, will talk of helping people in far off lands, but do nothing for the people in their own congregation, who are suffering.  Reverend Aldan in Little House, as the people of Walnut Grove, bent over backwards to help a fellow person struggling get back on their feat.  Religious institutions will not even let you in their doors, if you do not pay them.

JobFish is here to help you, as are the people here at ButterflyVista.  Let us help you with your job search.  Write us with your stories.  Share your thoughts.  With new dynamics in the job market, finding a job is tougher than in the past.  There can be help Little House style.

Sarah M. Weinberger
ButterflyVista Corporation

Comments: if you would like to post a comment, please help me identify you as not a spammer by not filling in the URL portion.  Also, please be specific and mention words and phrases from what I wrote.  Do not write things that say just “Great site” and “Good job” along with some sort of name and a URL.  I will treat those as spam.  Sorry, but it is not always easy to distinguish spam from not spam.

I was reading last a recent issue of Newsweek, staff writer Ezra Klein writes an article entitled “It’s Always the Economy, Stupid”.”  He talks about how elections are not decided based upon the candidate, but rather on the economical situation of the country as a whole.  The author even cited major Presidential wins such as Reagan and Nixon over McGovern as holding up to the model.  The author’s other main point is that in the Obama administration there are two competing thoughts.  The first is the economics team, which wants to push the economy with a second stimulus.  A second stimulus, as the author noted, is meaningless to help for the November elections coming up.  The other is polling team, which wants to focus on deficits.  The thesis was that Obama can do neither, and should therefore focus on governing.

I do not disagree with what he says.  It is too late for an economic stimulus package to do much.   Pushing through the unemployment package tomorrow is necessary, but that goes into good governess.  What Mr. Klein misses is that there is a third way.  Providing a stimulus package does not help white collar workers.  Heck, the government  cannot even get NASA properly funded and focused.  The Venture Star, the true successor to the space shuttle was killed by George W. Bush as too costly.  NASA has become risk adverse.  Sorry, NASA, but space is a risky proposition.  That being said, it can be done safer.  President Obama killed the Constellation program, a scaled back effort and more risk adverse project, of going back to the moon and providing launch capability to the International Space Station.  The government has no interest in funding white collar.  When the government talks of stimulus, what they really talk about is blue collar projects.  That is not a bad thing.  We desperately need roads.  I would love to see a second deck on I-405 and I-101.  I would like to see I-10 widened to accommodate more lanes.  That would help white collar workers, as traffic would not be so bad, thereby enabling longer commutes, which give greater job opportunities.

What the Obama Administration does not understand is a basic economic principle taught in high school, namely the closed cycle of capitalism.  Person A spends money somewhere giving it to company A.  Company B in turn spends money on products and services, which eventually gives Person A back the money spent on the initial transaction.  The system falls apart, when money flows out of the closed circle, such as occurs when people work here and send money abroad without that country sending money back here.  The circular system fails, when companies are allowed to outsource or hire people on an HI-B visa without that company having to pay society back.  Maybe two million dollars is not unreasonable a fee, as a friend of mine suggested, if that amount goes to fund programs that give workers jobs, such as a revitalized NASA (or other programs that help and further society).  Obama can pass laws today that make global economics fairer.  I am not suggesting going back to an isolationist society, such as after World War I, when Woodrow Wilson and his League of Nations (United Nations predecessor).  Global economics has done wonders for everyone including the United States.  That does not mean that laws cannot be passed to make things fairer.

After all, what is fair about applying for a job, when you are competing with Indians in India?  I worked at an aerospace company in Burbank (although I could have mentioned a major telecommunications company here in the Westside), where the majority of engineers (think 80%) are either H1-B or a division / outsourced company in India.  Do not think of one or two people that have special skills.  In each case, think of hundreds to thousands of workers.  Between these two companies we are talking conservatively about two thousand people at a minimum, but more likely than not is a lot more.  If we multiply that number by some factor taking into account the number of companies here in the United States and we are now talking tens of millions of jobs.  For every so many engineers, there are project managers, graphic artists, managers, secretaries, cleaning crews, and other employees that are necessary to support them.

How many people are now unemployed (rhetorical question)?  If you now subtract out these tens of millions from the laid off tens of millions and you would have a work shortage.  Let us take 20 million people.  If 20 million people were suddenly employed here in the United States and making a decent wage ($50,00 and up but more like $100,000).  If we deduct the usual city, state, government, Medicare, and Social Security taxes, we would no longer be talking of deficits and increased taxes but rather surpluses.

Regardless of how the economy does, employees need a tool that can help them.  I was told recently that I created JobFish, because of the difficulty in finding a job during The Great Recession.  That is totally inaccurate.  I started JobFish back in 2002 right at the beginning of the Dot Com bust.  At the time, I lost my job and then got another.  True the Dot Com bust was the impetus, but I was thinking about the product even before during the best of times.  Why?

There are tools a-plenty for employers and recruiters.  Companies are bending over backwards for them.  There are no tools for the job seeker.  Do not tell me job boards (i.e. Career Builder, Dice, Monster, Craig’s List, and one of my favorites Indeed).  Each one of them is annoying to use.  I can only look at them so much before getting frustrated.  Talking with recruiters is also annoying.  Keeping things straight is also annoying.

I often thought that I would like my own personal matchmaker, but for jobs.  I have talked to a couple Executive Recruiters, which want $5,000 for their services, but who has that kind of money to spend.  Most of the ones that I have dealt with seem like sharks trying to extort money from the desperate.  I could go on and on about what I think about Executive Recruiters, but even if one hires someone for this task, that person will still need tools, because then they become the job seeker.  You are just employing to do the dirty work for you.

No matter what the economic climate, job seekers need a tool that can help them, good economy or not.  I understand what it means to be unemployed.  I understand the tools that one would need.  I understand the frustrations.  I understand all too well the misery and desperate feelings that one helps when one is unemployed.

Before wrapping up, I want to address a comment that I hear again and again, namely that I cannot afford JobFish.  That is such horseshit.  That really is.  That is the wrong attitude too.  Can you afford to be unemployed month after month?  Can you afford to be tied down to a computer all day, when you could go get another job?  Most people still go out to eat or see a movie, unless one is really desperate.  People should be happy that a tool like JobFish exists and want to support it.  The alternative is that there is no JobFish.

People are so focused on the status quo that they forget that there can be an easier way.  I heard from a the leader of a job club on the East Coast recently.  This person was skeptical and gave the usual song and dance.  Seriously, I keep hearing the same story.  Thankfully, this person agreed to give JobFish a try.  From getting no callbacks in a year, within a week this person started to receive phone calls (plural).  This person could also apply for many multiples of the number of jobs that this person previously could at a fraction of the time.  I also heard about the frustration level being greatly reduced.  That was why I created JobFish, because these issues are timeless and there should be a tool that helps job seekers and contractors looking for new clients.

Give JobFish a try.  Go to www.jobfish.com today.  Let me know what you think of JobFish.  As James T. Kirk said in the original Star Trek series, The City on the Edge of Forever, let us help you.

Sarah M. Weinberger
ButterflyVista Corporation